From: Andrew S. <str...@as...> - 2004-04-15 17:09:09
|
On Apr 12, 2004, at 6:33 PM, Daishi Harada wrote: > On mac os x, I was going to use fink for the dependencies, and so > I modified setupext.py as follows: > > (snipped diff output) > > Do most of the users of matplotlib on os x not use fink? Because I often build extensions for others, I try to stay away from fink as much as possible in this step. Not because I don't like it, but because I'm reluctant to require yet another dependency. For someone without fink, it's probably easier to just install freetype than fink and freetype. Furthermore, I think it should be possible to compile matplotlib against the a static freetype library that gets installed directly with matplotlib, thus not relying on any external dependency. I think I can share some of the credit/blame Mac OS X-specific build stuff, and I certainly didn't want to make fink a requirement. For the fink-inclined, I think the best thing to do is to make fink-based matplotlib distribution which is built against the other fink stuff. > The stumper > for me is that I have been unable to build scipy/numpy for the python > that is bundled with os x - has anyone been successful with this? > (is this process documented anywhere?) I have an old build that just worked from mid-2003, and I haven't had much success in the few times I've tried to update since then. Sorry, I can't be much help here. But why do you include numpy in your statement? There's no problem with this one. I think it's even included with the PackageManager stuff, and I'd be surprised if fink didn't include it, too. |