From: Sourish B. <sou...@gm...> - 2015-06-05 21:35:08
|
<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 06/05/2015 12:44 PM, Jody Klymak wrote:<br> </div> <blockquote cite="mid:851...@uv..." type="cite"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> <br class=""> <div> <blockquote type="cite" class=""> <div class="">On 5 Jun 2015, at 11:39 AM, Sourish Basu <<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:sou...@gm..." class="">sou...@gm...</a>> wrote:</div> <br class="Apple-interchange-newline"> <div class=""><span style="font-family: LucidaSans-Typewriter; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">This problem is reasonably common for me, BTW. I can have a carbon monoxide field with an average/background of 60 ppb, but variations from 30 to 550 ppb. So I need a color scale which (a) is white at 60, and (b) shows small variations below 60 and large variations above 60 with equal "clarity”.</span></div> </blockquote> <br class=""> </div> <div>If you need to see small changes at low values and they are equally important to large changes at high values, then taking the logarithm is often useful (or scaling your colorbar logarithmically). <br> </div> </blockquote> <br> Which would still have the problem that similar color saturations/values at the two ends of the colorbar would represent different (linear) distances away from the median/"zero" value.<br> <br> But I see your point, in my specific example the confusion is made worse because the two ends have the same sat/val, just different hues. Lately I've started 'sandwiching' different types of colorbars (see attached) to get around that issue.<br> <br> Cheers,<br> Sourish<br> <br> <blockquote cite="mid:851...@uv..." type="cite"> <div><br class=""> </div> <div>Cheers, Jody</div> <div><br class=""> </div> <br class=""> <div apple-content-edited="true" class=""> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; border-spacing: 0px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Lucida Sans Typewriter'; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; orphans: 2; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;"> <div class="">--</div> <div class="">Jody Klymak </div> <div class=""><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://web.uvic.ca/%7Ejklymak/" class="">http://web.uvic.ca/~jklymak/</a></div> <div class=""><br class="khtml-block-placeholder"> </div> <div class=""><br class="khtml-block-placeholder"> </div> <br class="Apple-interchange-newline"> </span><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"> </div> <br class=""> </blockquote> <br> <br> <div class="moz-signature">-- <br> <b>Q:</b> What if you strapped C4 to a boomerang? Could this be an effective weapon, or would it be as stupid as it sounds?<br> <b>A:</b> Aerodynamics aside, I’m curious what tactical advantage you’re expecting to gain by having the high explosive fly back at you if it misses the target.<br> </div> </body> </html> |