|
From: Daniele N. <da...@gr...> - 2013-11-02 18:20:04
|
On 02/11/2013 19:07, Joe Kington wrote: > Hi Daniele, > > First off, the FSF uses and endorses a number of non GPL licenses. They > reccomend the Apache license over MIT-style licenses for permissive > cases due to patent issues, but they don't require it. In fact, even > the GNU project has several X11 (the FSF's name for the MIT license) > licensed projects (e.g. Off the top of my head, I know ncurses is both > an official GNU project and is X11-licensed.). Thank for the info. I knew that the FSF endorses a number of different licenses, but I was under the impression that the only projects for which copyright transfer was in place were under the GPL or LGPL license. I don't know if it makes much sense for other, more permissive, licenses. > However, I'm glad you brought this up. I haven't actually filled out a > copyright transfer form to the FSF. I intended to at one point, but > never did and didn't think about the copyright assignment in the license > header very much. Not doing so, and leaving copyright in the name of any > potential contributors actually makes things quite a bit simpler. Indeed. I believe going the burden of copyright transfer makes sense only for major projects under copyleft licenses. Cheers, Daniele |