From: Brian G. <ell...@gm...> - 2015-06-04 16:37:18
|
I very much like D. On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Joe Kington <jof...@gm...> wrote: > Well that got horribly garbled somehow (and I hit send too early). Let me > try that again: > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Joe Kington <jof...@gm...> > wrote: > >> One other (admittedly very minor) consideration is how the colormaps look >> with shading applied. To borrow from the hillshading example >> <http://matplotlib.org/devdocs/examples/specialty_plots/topographic_hillshading.html> >> : >> >> (The image appears to be too large to attatch. Try here: http:// >> <http://www.geology.beer/images/hillshaded.png>www.geology.beer >> <http://www.geology.beer/images/hillshaded.png>/images/ >> <http://www.geology.beer/images/hillshaded.png>hillshaded.png >> <http://www.geology.beer/images/hillshaded.png>) >> <http://www.geology.beer/images/hillshaded.png> >> >> I personally really like option D for a lot of reasons, but this is >> another reason to prefer it. Providing additional information through >> "shading" etc, still works quite well. Option C also does well in this >> particular test, though it appears too "washed out" for my tastes. >> >> At least to my eyes, options B fairs particularly poorly. In B's case, >> the fact that the colormap runs towards black means that hillshading is >> difficult to distinguish from elevation changes. A suffers from similar >> problems in this case, though they're much less severe. >> >> In my personal opinion: D >> A > C > B >> >> Cheers, >> -Joe >> Fun activity: watch all 6 videos in a row then watch the text on this >> email spin and spin. =P >> >> Gorgeous! Thanks Nathan! >> >> I hope this kills C dead. It clearly makes certain features of the >> simulation harder to spot. >> >> A great demo of the terribleness of jet, too: it looks like a huge mess. >> >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nat...@gm...> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Stéfan van der Walt <st...@su...> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nat...@gm...> >>>> wrote: >>>> > I'm a big fan of option D. So much so that when I needed to make a >>>> movie of >>>> > ony my galaxy simulations today I went ahead and used it: >>>> > >>>> > https://youtu.be/bnm554et0T8 >>>> >>>> Beautiful! How hard would it be to also do this for the other >>>> proposed colormaps? >>>> >>> >>> Thankfully you made it pretty easy to script this. >>> >>> jet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsvT5hImPmo >>> >>> parula: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8146CMi-OaQ >>> >>> option a: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqvxuQSzWO4 >>> >>> option b: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wa7bpV3XPV0 >>> >>> option c: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rHbq4jw1ew >>> >>> option d: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_HiUXVNm2k >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Stéfan >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Matplotlib-devel mailing list >>>> Mat...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Matplotlib-devel mailing list >>> Mat...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel >>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Matplotlib-devel mailing list >> Mat...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel > > -- Brian E. Granger Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo @ellisonbg on Twitter and GitHub bgr...@ca... and ell...@gm... |