From: Neil G. <mis...@gm...> - 2015-05-13 20:12:52
|
If you want to make arrowheads look at all decent, they really need to be enclosed in Bezier curves. See the diagram here: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/150289/how-do-you-accomplish-stealth-with-the-new-arrows-meta/230965#230965 The first two look like garbage. The last one is the only one that looks good imho. Best, Neil On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> wrote: > On 2015/05/13 9:36 AM, Neil Girdhar wrote: > >> I don't know matplotlib well enough (yet) to know what the change would >> consist of. >> >> I suggest you take a look at the beautiful tikz manual: >> http://pgf.sourceforge.net/pgf_CVS.pdf >> > > Very helpful, thank you. > > >> The arrows.meta on page 201–212 are really well-designed and beautiful. >> >> Compare this with matplotlib's custom arrows: >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16968007/custom-arrow-style-for-matplotlib-pyplot-annotate >> >> How do I make tikz's arrowheads available for all backends? >> >> > My guess offhand is that this is a matter of using the mpl API. I don't > think we would want to add all of these types and options to the mpl core; > but a toolkit might be ideal for this. The mpl API, which generates the > same results for all backends, is quite complete and flexible. Things like > arrowheads are Patch objects, and you can specify any path you want. The > main trick is figuring out how to handle transforms--what kind of > coordinates should the path be specifying? How should things scale as a > figure is reshaped and resized? > > For many of these types you could also use mpl Line2D objects, for which > several properties including cap style can be specified. Not all of the > TikZ options would be available, but perhaps enough. > > Eric > > |