From: Sandro T. <mo...@de...> - 2015-02-08 19:04:31
|
Hi all! On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Thomas Caswell <tca...@gm...> wrote: > Hey all, > > To start with, the 2.0 release is pending a choice of new default color map. > I think that when we pick that we should cut 2.0 off of the last release and > then the next minor release turns into 2.1. If we want to do other breaking > changes we will just do a 3.0 when that happens. It makes sense to me to > bundle default color changes as one set of breaking changes and code API > changes as another. > > Eric made the case in an issue that we should not continue the 1.4.x series > and start working 1.5.0, which fits well with aiming for a 6month scheduled > release cycle (minor release in July, bug-fix release in February). Do I understand correctly you plan to maintain 2 separate development lines (like Python with 2.x and 3.x) as 1.5.x and 2.x ? Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi |