From: Federico A. <ari...@gm...> - 2014-09-05 13:41:41
|
Steven I just had a look at image_inspector. The `Tools` (in mpl jargon are `widgets`) look great. Some replicate what we already have but more modern (for me this is positive improvement). Regarding the roi_inspector, this is a great fit for MEP22 tools (Almost done). My suggestion would be to take a look at `matplotlib.widgets.Widget` and `matplotlib.widgets.AxesWidget` to see how easy/hard would it be to adapt or integrate your tools (widgets) there. Personally I don't like the idea of a separate sibling repo. It makes just things more confusing. Federico On 4 Sep 2014 23:42, "Thomas Caswell" <tca...@gm...> wrote: > Steven, > > I would love to get to as much of that functionality into mpl proper > as possible. Please open an issue / make a MEP for this. > > Unfortunately I have not had a chance to take a close look at > image_inspector yet and I am a tad concerned about the potential for > re-invented wheels between yours tools and the existing widgets (and > to be fair, I only have a cursory understanding of those widgets). I > agree all the functionality should be in mpl (or as much as we can > shove down through our gui frame work independent filter), but don't > want to get pinned down to committing to specific implementation > details. > > Another option might be to put all of these tools in a sibling repo to > mpl under the mpl organization. > > I have cc'd the mpl-dev list. > > Tom > > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Steven Silvester > <ste...@gm...> wrote: > > Thomas, > > > > How about the broader discussion of incorporating the tools in > > https://github.com/blink1073/image_inspector into mpl (ideally as a > > replacement or alternative for some of the existing tools)? If I combine > > that with paint tool and we get those pushed into mpl proper, then we can > > just use them as-is for skimage. Should I open an mpl issue to discuss? > > > > - Steve > > > > On Thursday, September 4, 2014 4:49:28 PM UTC-5, Thomas Caswell wrote: > >> > >> If you are doing this with matplotlib, can you actually push the tools > >> back upstream? > >> > >> Tom (a mpl dev) > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Stéfan van der Walt <ste...@sun.ac.za> > >> wrote: > >> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Emmanuelle Gouillart > >> > <emmanuelle...@nsup.org> wrote: > >> >> Answering my own question: I had forgotten that the viewer examples > >> >> include such kind of example, inside watershed_demo.py. Thanks Tony > >> >> for the example! > >> > > >> > I think this is an important enough use-case to make it a utility > >> > function--feel free to add an issue! > >> > > >> > Stéfan > >> > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > Groups "scikit-image" group. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > >> > an email to scikit-image...@googlegroups.com. > >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Thomas Caswell > >> tcas...@gmail.com > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "scikit-image" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to sci...@go.... > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > -- > Thomas Caswell > tca...@gm... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Slashdot TV. > Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. > http://tv.slashdot.org/ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel > |