From: Benjamin R. <ben...@ou...> - 2014-06-26 22:57:28
|
Just noticed an oddity with the tests on Travis versus the tests on my machine. The test log on Travis for a single run has over 10,000 lines. But, for me, it is over ~4800 lines. At a glance, I can see that test_mlab is not executed for me, but they are for Travis. I am very suspicious of the test_mlab run on Travis because it seems to be running multiple times, but I can't be sure. Michael, can I get the test log for one of the recent Travis runs? Thanks, Ben Root On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Benjamin Root <ben...@ou...> wrote: > So, I just tried comparing memory usage for a plot displayed via show() > versus savefig() as a PNG. It would seem that saving to pngs uses more > memory. Not sure why, though. > > Ben > On Jun 4, 2014 12:57 PM, "Eric Firing" <ef...@ha...> wrote: > >> On 2014/06/04 6:26 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: >> >>> A theory... >>> >>> If I remember correctly, the nosttests was set up to execute in parallel >>> using the default Multiprocessing settings, which is to have a process >>> worker for each available CPU core. Perhaps this might be the crux of >>> the issue with so many simultaneous tests running that the amount of >>> memory used at the same time becomes too large. Or, am I thinking of the >>> doc build system? >>> >>> Ben Root >>> >> >> Ben, >> >> Top shows a single process. The VM is configured with 2 cores. >> >> Eric >> > |