From: Russell E. O. <ro...@uw...> - 2013-07-31 21:15:13
|
In article <51F...@st...>, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: > On 07/31/2013 01:47 PM, Russell E. Owen wrote: > > In article <51F...@st...>, > > Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> > > wrote: > > > >> I have tagged and uploaded matplotlib 1.3.0 final. Congratulations to > >> all involved! It was a long slog getting this release out, and I > >> appreciate everyone's patience. > >> > >> Once we have binaries uploaded to SourceForge, I will make a formal > >> announcement in the usual channels. > > I built the Mac binary on MacOS X 10.6 but have run into two problems: > > - Most of the unit tests are missing, so I can't properly test the > > results. But my application that uses matplotlib and TkAgg works fine, > > so may well be OK. Also, I checked and the installer was trying to build > > all expected backends (including the native Mac backend). > > What do you mean the unit tests are missing? They don't run? Can you > send the output from nose? > > Glad to hear about the installer building the macosx backend -- that was > pretty serious when it wasn't doing that. Yes. All the interesting information about a build is printed at the beginning and soon scrolls out of sight, so it's usually not obvious if a build is missing something expected. That seems to be standard for unix and distutils installers, so I suspect it would not be trivial to change. Would it make sense to add a unit test that verifies the mac backend was built? -- Russell |