From: Paulo C. P. de A. <pau...@gm...> - 2013-01-16 19:24:53
|
2013/1/16 Michael Droettboom <md...@st...>: [...] >> $ ls /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/mpl-data/fonts/ttf/ >> LICENSE_STIX STIXNonUniBol.ttf STIXSizOneSymBol.ttf >> STIXGeneralBolIta.ttf STIXNonUniIta.ttf STIXSizOneSymReg.ttf >> STIXGeneralBol.ttf STIXNonUni.ttf STIXSizThreeSymBol.ttf >> STIXGeneralItalic.ttf STIXSizFiveSymReg.ttf STIXSizThreeSymReg.ttf >> STIXGeneral.ttf STIXSizFourSymBol.ttf STIXSizTwoSymBol.ttf >> STIXNonUniBolIta.ttf STIXSizFourSymReg.ttf STIXSizTwoSymReg.ttf >> >> This should require asking permission for bundling, but not duplicating >> as ttf stix font are not installed. Before asking for it, you may want to >> look at the test results: BTW, note that asking for such permissions may take a very long time, and may be "denied" unless there is a very convincing reason to bundle it... >> http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/matplotlib-2.7-mpl-data-with-bundled-stix-ttf.txt >> Because I did not see any difference on the results, so I probably missed >> some step... > > > Did you turn USE_FONTCONFIG back to False? font-config won't find fonts > here, but matplotlib's built-in font lookup mechanism will. Ops :-) but I think something is still messed, maybe it is getting confused by finding system STIX 1.1 before the bundled ones somehow: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/matplotlib-2.7-bundled-stix-ttf+fontconfig=false.txt > Mike Paulo |