From: Damon M. <dam...@gm...> - 2013-01-16 00:20:12
|
Hi all, Recently, it has become more and more common that the travis builds fail. They fail not because the test suite fails but because of some inherent issues with travis itself. Usually, either the git clone fails or some other simple shell command fails. I consider these 'failures' as being false negatives. While a false negative once or twice a month would not be anything to worry about, I feel like this is happening often enough to render the pull request status extremely unhelpful. I realise the above is merely my opinion, but I feel that I would be surprised if others did not find the Travis' false negative hit rate tiresome. If practical, I would like to move away from travis and have our test suite run on a more reliable service. How do others feel about this? -- Damon McDougall http://www.damon-is-a-geek.com Institute for Computational Engineering Sciences 201 E. 24th St. Stop C0200 The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX 78712-1229 |