From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2013-01-07 21:41:45
|
On 01/07/2013 12:38 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 2013/01/07 7:29 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: >> I, also, am not too much up on the details --- but I think if it's >> possible for "make install" to just call "python setup.py install" under >> the hood, I'd have no objections. > I think I would even object to that. What would be the point of it? > What problem would it solve? > Very little point, admittedly. But I still encounter sysadmins who insist on "./configure; make; make install" to work sometimes. Mike |