From: Damon M. <dam...@gm...> - 2012-10-13 23:52:16
|
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> wrote: > On 2012/10/13 1:16 PM, Damon McDougall wrote: >> I probably should have tested the waters first, but I added a PEP8 >> github label. It's neon orange so you can't miss it. The reason I did >> this is so that the list of v1.2.x milestoned issues can be easily >> filtered by eye. That way it looks less daunting (since PEP8 isn't a >> huge priority for version 1.2 (at least not compared to bug fixes)) >> and it's easier to see the more important issues. >> >> It's also temporary. Nelle's done a great job trawling through the >> codebase and raising some important points. There's a finite amount of >> bulk work to do and then the label can be removed. >> >> If anyone is offended by neon orange, please feel free to change it. I >> just wanted to be able to organise things a little more succinctly. >> > > I don't care about the color, but I don't understand the rationale for > putting these PEP8 changes in v1.2.x, especially when they are based on > master. It seemed to me that the thing to do was get out a v1.2 release > without the PEP8 changes, and let them be the basis in master for > proceeding to v1.3. > > Evidently I was wrong, and we are instead doing massive cherry-picking > from master. > > A disadvantage of this is that PEP8 changes, though seemingly innocuous, > could introduce subtle bugs, so rushing them in at the end of the rc > cycle seems like it is taking an unnecessary risk for no functional benefit. > > Eric The downside of merging them into master without cherry-picking into 1.2 is the horrific merge conflicts that will occur whenever there's a pull request based on 1.2. I see your point of introducing subtle bugs. I'm happy to wait on the PEP8 changes if it seems too risky. -- Damon McDougall http://www.damon-is-a-geek.com B2.39 Mathematics Institute University of Warwick Coventry West Midlands CV4 7AL United Kingdom |