From: Benjamin R. <ben...@ou...> - 2012-08-24 12:43:34
|
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> wrote: > On 2012/08/23 6:41 PM, Fernando Perez wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> wrote: > >> I'm not sure I understand what you are getting at, but I don't think > there > >> should be any interface changes for plot or for their log variants. > > > > I probably phrased my question poorly. I'm just wondering, how would > > one use the proposed stackplot function to obtain a stacked plot but > > that used log axes (x, y or both)? > > One would follow the stackplot call with calls to xscale('log') and/or > yscale('log'). This works fine for the x-axis (if x values are > positive), but when the y-axis is log, the bottom region is not filled, > presumably because it is trying to fill down to zero. I haven't looked > at the code, so I don't know whether there is some way of improving this > behavior without the stackplot call knowing beforehand that it will be > dealing with a log axis. > > Eric > > This is a similar problem that we face with bar() and hist()... Ben Root |