From: Fernando P. <fpe...@gm...> - 2012-08-24 00:55:01
|
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> wrote: > OK, here are mine: I oppose overloading plot with a "stacked" kwarg and > functionality. It is complicated enough as it is. I don't see any > problem with having "stackplot" and hist(..., stacked=True). They are > just not all that similar. Nor are "plot" and "stackplot" so very > similar. But stacked and non-stacked histograms *are* very similar, so > using the kwarg to turn on stacking there makes sense. Quick q: how would things like log plots be handles for the stacked case? Log plots are really just axis scale choices on a normal plot, but for historical reasons they happen to be implemented via a bunch of different functions. But for that reason, any interface changes that make sense for plot pretty should also apply to the *log* functions, no? Cheers, f |