From: Damon M. <dam...@gm...> - 2012-07-11 17:53:24
|
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:23:32AM -0500, John Hunter wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Damon McDougall <dam...@gm... > > wrote: > > > > Well, as Ben said, that error fill plot is neato! It doesn't look too > > complicated, either. I'd be more than happy to port it over later today > > when I get bored of typing up my thesis. It'll probably only take me > > about 30 minutes. > > > > If nobody is opposed to this idea, I'll go ahead and submit a PR this > > evening (British Summer (hah!) Time). > > > > > While it is a nice graph, I am not sure that the use case is common enough > to justify a new plotting method. One can get the same result with: > > > In [68]: x = np.linspace(0, 2 * np.pi) > > In [69]: y_sin = np.sin(x) > > In [70]: err = np.concatenate([y_sin + 0.2, y_sin[::-1] - 0.2]) > > In [71]: plot(x, y_sin) > Out[71]: [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D object at 0x96959ec>] > > In [72]: fill_between(np.concatenate([x, x[::-1]]), err, facecolor='red', > alpha=0.5) > Out[72]: <matplotlib.collections.PolyCollection object at 0x962758c> > > Admittedly the [::-1] thing is a bit counter-intuitive, but rather than > adding a new plotting method, perhaps we would be better off with a helper > method to create the xs and ys for fill_between > > xs, ys = mlab.pad_line(x, y, 0.2) > fill_between(xs, ys) > > JDH +1 on the helper function. That's probably a much less bloated of way of doing it. -- Damon McDougall http://damon-is-a-geek.com B2.39 Mathematics Institute University of Warwick Coventry West Midlands CV4 7AL United Kingdom |