From: Damon M. <dam...@gm...> - 2012-07-06 14:49:43
|
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 07:43:39PM +0000, Russell E. Owen wrote: > In article <EF3...@uw...>, > Russell Owen <ro...@uw...> wrote: > > > I just uploaded the Mac binaries. > > > > Several minor concerns: > > - Many unit tests failed on Mac OS X 10.4 (which is where I build the 10.3.9 > > version) due to "too many files open", but the same binary looks fine on > > 10.5. > > - The 64-bit version (10.6 and later) had one unexpected failure on 10.7 (I > > have not yet had time to test it on 10.6)... > > When I tested on Mac OS X 10.6 I found that most unit tests were somehow > missing. Rather than try to diagnose the problem, I built a new binary > on 10.6, confirmed that it installed properly (with all unit tests) on > 10.6 and 10.7, then uploaded it to replace the earlier 10.6 binary. > > The same test I mentioned in my previous post still fails using the new > binary, on both 10.6 and 10.7. > > -- Russell > I did a git checkout of the v1.1.1 tag and compiled a 64-bit version. I have attached output from the following command: python -c "import matplotlib as m ; m.test(verbosity=1)" Note that some of the tests fail with satuses: KEFKK. I have the following requirements installed: nose: version 1.1.2 PIL: version 1.1.7 ghsotscript: version 9.05 inkscape: 0.48.3.1 All of these were installed using the latest version of macports. Is there anything I can do to improve the output of the tests? -- Damon McDougall http://damon-is-a-geek.com B2.39 Mathematics Institute University of Warwick Coventry West Midlands CV4 7AL United Kingdom |