From: Benjamin R. <ben...@ou...> - 2012-05-01 16:31:58
|
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Chris Barker <chr...@no...> wrote: > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Thomas Kluyver <th...@kl...> > wrote: > > On 1 May 2012 17:04, Chris Barker <chr...@no...> wrote: > >> (the license looks BSD-ish to me) > > > > At a glance, I think it's the X11 license, aka MIT license. > > > Would there be a problem bringing it in to MPL in that case? > > -Chris > > AFAIK, no, it shouldn't be a problem. The question is where. I suspect it would fit best as a mpl_toolkit. Ben Root P.S. - Of course, you do realize that you are essentially making yourself the de facto maintainer of it, right? |