From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2012-03-07 18:48:53
|
On 03/07/2012 01:39 PM, John Hunter wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st... > <mailto:md...@st...>> wrote: > > I agree that the deprecation process should have been followed > better. However, I'm not sure what you mean by them being faster > than their Pyhton counterparts. Both functions in nxutils are > replaced by functions in _path.cpp, which are also written in C++ > but are more complete and don't have broken corner cases. They > may be slightly slower because they have a few more checks and > handle Bezier curves, but they are not significantly slower. > > > > What about providing a python module nxutils in master (1.2) that has > the same signature as the old nxutils extension code, calls the path > functionality, and raises a deprecation warning with suggested a > suggested code migration? And then remove it for 1.3 > Yeah. I think that's a good way out of this. I'll file a bug and self-assign. Mike |