From: federico v. <vag...@gm...> - 2012-02-23 16:30:12
|
I think you are correct - and I think the fact that the line width of the error bar is larger (compared to the size of the rectangle) gives the impression the top rectangle is actually darker. I see - it's just a matter of playing around with the error bar properties to make it look pretty. Thanks, Federico On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Benjamin Root <ben...@ou...> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:03 AM, federico vaggi <vag...@gm... > > wrote: > >> Hi Ben, >> >> In the pre-resizing pictures, each bar is drawn as two rectangles, the >> first until the lower margin of the standard deviation, the second until >> the mean. >> >> It looks like it draws one rectangle from: >> >> 0:(MEAN-STD) >> >> and another from: >> >> MEAN-STD to MEAN+STD >> >> After resizing, it is just a single rectangle with the standard deviation >> drawn as normal. >> >> I presume the 2nd version is meant to be correct, but absolutely no >> graphics properties are altered (besides manually re-sizing the window). >> >> Federico >> >> > Sorry, I am not seeing what you are saying. Just to be clear, when you > say "bar", are you referring to the gray rectangles that denote the mean or > the errorbars that denote the standard deviations? > > What might be confusing is that in the first graph, the "cap" of the > errorbars (the horizontal line on the ends of each errorbar) is almost the > same width as the gray bars themselves. This sort of makes it look like > there are two gray bars stacked on top of each other. Is this what you are > referring to? > > Ben Root > > |