|
From: Sandro T. <mo...@de...> - 2011-10-07 22:17:18
|
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 21:55, Fernando Perez <fpe...@gm...> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Benjamin Root <ben...@ou...> wrote: >> That's valid. I guess I am just wondering if there is a decent error >> message to the user explaining that the test could not proceed. > > Rig the test runner to properly skip them instead of failing? The > test data should be considered a dependency for those tests, and > absent the dependency, the users simply get less tests, but not a ton > of failures. > > Not saying this should be done *now*, +1 Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi |