From: Eric F. <ef...@ha...> - 2011-02-26 22:58:22
|
On 02/26/2011 10:54 AM, Darren Dale wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Darren Dale<dsd...@gm...> wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Eric Firing<ef...@ha...> wrote: >>> On 02/26/2011 09:26 AM, Darren Dale wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Eric Firing<ef...@ha...> wrote: >>>>> On 02/16/2011 08:38 AM, Darren Dale wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Fernando Perez<fpe...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>> are you guys planning on transfering the old bugs to github? >>>>>> >>>>>> Probably at some point. >>>>>> >>>>>>> As I >>>>>>> mentioned, I have code lying around for the upload (and to download >>>>>>> from launchpad, but that's irrelevant here). I'm going to be mosly >>>>>>> offline til Monday (conference trip), but if someone pings me on my >>>>>>> Berkeley email address, which I monitor even while traveling, I'll be >>>>>>> happy to help out. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, that would be very helpful. I'll follow up once I figure out >>>>>> how to extract the information from sourceforge. >>>>> >>>>> Darren, >>>>> >>>>> Just a heads-up on that: In November the tracker was heavily spammed. >>>>> Recently I marked a few hundred items with the "delete" disposition, but >>>>> I don't think that actually gets rid of them. If it doesn't, then maybe >>>>> they can be filtered out during the transfer. >>>> >>>> We have some additional spam that needs to be deleted. How did you do >>>> it? When I try to delete several at once (mass change), I get an error >>>> message: "XSRF Attempt Detected!" >>>> >>> >>> I made the tracker display the maximum number of entries per page, then >>> clicked "check all", then "mass update" with "delete", and it marked >>> them as "deleted"--but they never get deleted. They are still there, >>> but marked "deleted". It sounds like that is the same as what you tried, >>> so I don't know why you are getting that error message. >>> >>> Which tracker category is showing the new spam? >> >> The Feature Requests. I was not able to mark the spam as deleted, but >> I filtered it out in the conversion. > > Let me try again: > > The tracker export xml file and conversion script are up at > https://github.com/darrendale/mpl-issues , and the issues can be > previewed at https://github.com/darrendale/mpl-issues/issues . Devs, > please have a > look. I only imported the open issues, including bugs, patches, > feature requests and support requests. If we decide to use the github > tracker, we can tell sourceforge we have relocated the project, and > the project will remain intact and archived. I don't know if that > would mean that we can no longer host the homepage at sourceforge. The submitter info is lost? And when it was originally submitted? If yes to either, then I think that we should not transfer these from sourceforge, but deal with them there. Overall, the tracking interface on github looks so bad that I can't see why we would want to move. Sourceforge is slow, but at least the tracker has the right sort of functionality: the ability to scan a lot of info on one screen, the ability to categorize, attach files, assign, etc. Maybe some of this is available but not evident in the github tracker, but what I see is not encouraging. Mpl historically has not done well in using the tracker. I hope that eventually we can transition to a tool that will help us do better, not worse. Eric |