From: Ondrej C. <on...@ce...> - 2009-03-05 15:10:54
|
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Rob Clewley <rob...@gm...> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:14 AM, Johann Cohen-Tanugi > <co...@sl...> wrote: >> wouaouh..... if I had known that sumpy had this functionality, I would >> have downloaded it ages ago. This is a good example of justified >> 'taylorisation', IMHO. >> Big +1 on seing this moved from sympy to matplotlib. I am not expert at >> coding guis et al, but if you need reviewers/testers or doc writers, I >> will be happy to give a hand (even two). >> best, >> Johann > > Yes, I didn't know that either. But it's not clear if I can plot > discrete data using this interface - at least the examples on the wiki I am not sure if I understand your question, but It only plots discrete data --- it takes some sympy expression, evaluates it on a discrete grid and plots it. So you would just take the plotting stuff. > make it look that way. I'm also +1 on seeing it moved into mpl, but I > don't know if the APIs and dependencies are too dissimilar to make it > work. There are no dependencies besides pyglet (e.g. it does not depend on sympy, or if it does, it can be trivially fixed). As to the API, just look into sympy/plotting. And play with the 3D plots in sympy to see how it looks like and how fast/slow it is (I think it's pretty fast). Then you will have to decide, if it's easier for you to implement something from scratch, or take our stuff. As I said, I would love if mpl has similar capability, so that we can get rid of this from sympy. If you decide to go this way, I (and other sympy developers) will be at hand to help you integrate it. Ondrej |