From: Darren D. <dsd...@gm...> - 2009-01-10 20:49:11
|
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 3:09 PM, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:57 AM, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Michiel de Hoon <mjl...@ya...> > wrote: > > > >> I have written such a function for the qt4 backend; see patch #2468809 > at > >> > >> > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2468809&group_id=80706&atid=560722 > >> > >> I am not a big qt4 user, so it would be good if somebody else could look > at this patch before adding it to the trunk. > > > > I would like to apply this patch, but I am not a qt user either, so if > > someone could test this and get back to us, that would be great. > > Never had any luck getting a tester, so I went ahead and committed > this to the trunk. I should probably get a working qt backend for > testing on one of the machines I use.... > I'm sorry John, I didnt see your original request for testing. I tried running the following with interactive on and off: from pylab import * import numpy figure() x=numpy.arange(20) y=1+x**2 n = 4 for i in range(n*n): subplot(n,n,i+1) bar(x,y,log=True) xlim(-5,25) ylim(1,1e4) I didnt notice any significant diffference in speed in the two modes with the qt4agg backend, and the figures looked fine. Is there anything else I should be looking for? Darren |