From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2009-01-06 16:11:31
|
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Drain, Theodore R <the...@jp...> wrote: > OK - nose it is. How do you want to handle the dependency? My opinion is that since tests are development tools, it's not unreasonable to require that nose be installed by the developer and not as an embedded dependency in MPL (or at least that should be an option). agreed JDH |