From: Eric W. <ewe...@gm...> - 2008-09-09 13:15:06
|
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: > You're right: multi-column legends aren't implemented. > > There have been a number of points raised lately around the layout of > legends (such as baseline alignment), that are starting to add up to a > push for a (partial) rewrite of the legend code. Unfortunately, I don't > think anyone has stepped up with time available to work on it. But I > think this should go on the list of things to consider, assuming we can > come up with a nice clean interface to present to the user. It would be > helpful to collect use cases for that. For example, would an option > "numcols" be enough (and the legend would just layout the text in that > number of columns), or would you want/need more control over where > individual elements are placed? > > Of course, we're always looking for new developers, and if you have the > motivation to work on this, I'm sure the various people on this list > would be happy to help you work through it. > > Cheers, > Mike I'd be willing to put some time in on that... I've not ever contributed code for anything though, so I'll be on a learning curve. I've had this problem myself. I would think a number of columns or a number of rows argument either would work.. just restrict based on one or the other, and if both are given... not sure about that one. What's a sensible way to ignore one or the other? |