From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2008-05-23 01:45:06
|
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Paul Kienzle <pki...@ni...> wrote: > It looks okay in Firefox 2.0.0.14 (though it did complain about missing the mathml > fonts). > > IE 7 displays the xml tree. I don't mind using latex for math where is really helps but I think we should try to keep it to a minimum, since it appears mathml in the browsers is poorly supported. I also want to keep the docstrings as human readable as possible. I know that in some cases latex *adds* to the human readability, but in other cases it detracts, so we want to balance the elegance of the final pdflatex generated PDF output with the reality that many will be seeing the docs either in plain text or improperly rendered HTML. If it can be done easily enough with ascii math art, we should prefer that. JDH |