|
From: Jeff W. <js...@fa...> - 2008-05-07 15:45:27
|
Michael Droettboom wrote: > I don't know if 0.98 has seen enough hammering to be a recommended > stable release. (Just today, Matthias Michler pointed out a pretty > significant bug with widgets related to the refactoring). I think a > 0.98 release that is clearly labeled as beta would not be a bad thing > to get it in the hands of more people who don't track SVN. > > I think a 0.91.3 release is probably also in order, since there are 23 > bugfixes, most notably the wx saving bug. I think that release is > important to push bugfixes out to distributions that already package > 0.91.2 (e.g. Ubuntu Hardy). > > And as for the egg issue (which I'm completely ignorant of) -- is that > something that could be fixed on 0.91.x without too much trouble? Is > it something that once worked and is now broken? > > Cheers, > Mike Mike: The egg issue required renaming matplotlib.toolkits to mpl_toolkits. We discussed this at the time, and decided it would cause too much code breakage to be included in 0.91.x. I'm OK with a 0.98 beta, but that's more work for Charlie to make extra installers and eggs. -Jeff > > Jeff Whitaker wrote: >> What do people think of releasing 0.98 after numpy 1.1 is released >> this weekend? >> The main reason I'd like to do this (instead of releasing another >> 0.91.x) is that the toolkits are broken in 0.91 - if matplotlib is >> installed as an egg basemap (or any other toolkit) cannot be installed. >> >> -Jeff >> >> > -- Jeffrey S. Whitaker Phone : (303)497-6313 Meteorologist FAX : (303)497-6449 NOAA/OAR/PSD R/PSD1 Email : Jef...@no... 325 Broadway Office : Skaggs Research Cntr 1D-124 Boulder, CO, USA 80303-3328 Web : http://tinyurl.com/5telg |