From: Fernando P. <Fer...@co...> - 2005-12-02 19:57:24
|
massimo sandal wrote: >> So relax, nobody is trying to be misleading about anything, we're all >> here simply working on what each of us needs, so the evolution process is >> rather inhomogeneous. > > > Perhaps I hadn't been clear. I'm not complaining of features missing. I'm > just saying that, for example, the docs are misleading, because they focus > on pylab when they would have to show both pylab and the OO interface. The docs don't "have" to show anything: they are as complete as the people who wrote them have had the time/energy/interest/ability to make them. It may well be true that the OO interface is under-documented (I don't know). If that is the case, then a worthwhile contribution woudl be to write such documentation, or to organize the existing one better. The mpl wiki cookbook is there for all to contribute, so you don't even need to bottleneck on John's time or resources. A good set of OO pages/tutorials on the wiki, with examples and summaries of WXMPL/MPlot/whatever would (if it doesn't exist already) be an excellent contribution that users can make. John has already explicitly said that he'd like to see wxmpl/mplot included, so he's obviously open to contributions on this front. Cheers, f |