From: Andrea R. <ari...@pi...> - 2005-10-22 02:11:03
|
On Oct 21, 2005, at 18:32 , Chris Barker wrote: > Jeff Whitaker wrote: > >> Andrea: There are lots of things that would work well - but the >> licensing is a problem. GTS is GPL, we need something with a less >> restrictive license (more like Python's). >> > > No, it's LGPL, which is much better, but maybe still not OK for > mpl. I guess the problem is that mpl is kind of a library of > libraries, rather than an application, so it would be awkward to > have mixed licenses in it. > > -Chris I suggested GTS exactly because I remembered that it is LGPL, and I thought it would had been ok for your needs. But I must admit that I know very little about licences. Andrea |