From: Fernando P. <fpe...@gm...> - 2008-01-04 19:44:19
|
[ oops, this was meant to be on-list] Hey Ondrej, On Jan 4, 2008 12:36 PM, Ondrej Certik <on...@ce...> wrote: > Hi Fernando! > > what you said are valid points for matplotlib using Agg as a backend. > And as I said, > the default matplotlib installation should include it, no doubt about that. > > On the other hand, I (and I think many other users) only need the super quality > only when saving the final plot. Of course, if it's worth the pain, I > can install the agg > backend and have the quality all the time, but many users will > sacrifice the quality, > if they can get at least some plot. > > If it was just me, I use Debian, so for me using any C compiled code > is zero pain. But, > the majority of users of sympy, are probably windows users. (At least there are > more downloads of the windows installer, than the mulitplatform tarball). And > I am not sure compiling anything on windows is a pleasant experience > (honestly I > think forcing a user of sympy compiling something on windows is a show stopper). Indeed, compiled code in a project basically forces you to have a windows developer in the team who can build the binary installers. These days with vmware/qemu it's not the end of the world (it can be done in a normal computer running linux/osx) but it's still a pain for most of us, no doubt about it. Again, I was just trying to provide context. From where I stand, I'm cheering as hard as I can for you guys to succeed. Cheers, f |