From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2007-12-06 15:50:42
|
On Dec 6, 2007 8:03 AM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: > It's an open question whether autolayout may start ignoring the adjust > requests or not as a backward compatibility measure. I still consider > this stuff a long way off until it's usable in general. My feeling is that it is not a good idea to try and support the manual layout and the autolayout with the same set of parameters, but how to get this segregation right may be difficult in practice. Eg, it is probably better to have something like a vbox and hbox pad that the user can configure for the autolayout if they want to increase the whitespace between the axes using autolayout, rather than trying to support the subplots adjust parameters. Depending on the figure.autolayout setting, one might launch a different GUI widget panel (eg the subplots_adjust widgets if autolayout is False, and a different widget with different params if it is True). JDH |