From: Andrew S. <str...@as...> - 2007-12-05 18:16:53
|
Michael Droettboom wrote: > ...probably because I forgot to attach it. (When will my e-mail > client read my mind?) I've also attached a version with a new version > of the layout algorithm -- in addition to making all axes that were > initially aligned remain aligned, it sets an axes that originally were > the same size to remain the same size. Better... but aside from it > theoretically picking up some false positives, it tends to add more > space than necessary between axes. It probably needs a fourth pass to > minimize the gaps. Thanks, got them this time. They both look acceptable, the 2nd looks pretty good. I gather it doesn't require any additional user commands, but just picks up the desired layout based on the axes bounds (in other words, the same script)? |