From: William H. <wh...@gm...> - 2005-06-03 15:22:56
|
Hi Darren On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 09:48 -0400, Darren Dale wrote: > > Since I also have limited time, I could use epswrite for now. The resulting > > figures are not fantastic on screen, (I already had smooth line art enabled > > in Adobe Reader), but marginal improvements can be had by increasing the > > viewer's resolution. > > I have some good news! This morning I discovered the ability to set the > resolution during the creation of an eps file with epswrite: > > gs -dBATCH -dNOPAUSE -dSAFER -q -r6000 -sDEVICE=epswrite -dLanguageLevel=3 \ > -dEPSFitPage -sOutputFile=foo.eps foo.ps > > This file can be embedded in a new latex document and it has no font > information so the text is rendered properly. The final output looks great > when printed or viewed with Adobe Reader. I think this is the way to go. As > for file size, the eps output from examples/tex_demo.py is about 50KB. > Hmm, very strange. I'd been getting all the same results without bothering with the ghostscript resolution switch. I can't honestly see why the resolution should have much to do with it since I thought it only affected any vector->raster conversions, whereas epswrite should be keeping everything as vector, albeit flattened. I am using GNU Ghostscript 7.07 (2003-05-17). My files look fine on-screen in ghostview et al. When converted to PDF they look godawful in xpdf and kpdf but fine in acroread with "Smooth Line Art" enabled. Cheers Will -- Dr William Henney, Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Morelia |