From: John H. <jdh...@ac...> - 2004-02-02 17:07:35
|
>>>>> "John" == John Gill <jn...@eu...> writes: Hi John, could you also subscribe to matplotlib-devel and CC the messages to me (matplotlib-devel sometimes has a long lag). It would be nice to have these discussions there for archival purposes and so that others can offer suggestions. Hopefully, you'll have an easier time getting sighed up there than you did on matplotlib-users. John> John, First the good news. I've had a good read of John> legend.py and now pretty much understand how it is working. Excellent, between the 2 of us, that makes at least one person who understands that code <wink>. John> Now the bad news. The way I'm thinking about these tables John> is that I will want to draw them below the main plot area, John> sort of where the xticklabels go at the moment + the area John> below. But you should try and code it generally so people can place them wherever they want right? Perhaps you should construct the table with a list of horizontal lines and a list of vertical lines and their respective transforms (see below). Or are you already doing this? John> Now I tried hacking about a table.py copy of legend.py and John> drawing a grid of lines in this area -- the code runs fine John> but I don't get a nice grid of lines :( (see snippet of code John> below). John> If I cheat and arrange for the drawing to take place within John> the main plot (by carefully fixing the ypos stuff below) John> then things work fine. John> I'm guessing I need to do something to let matplotlib know John> the extent of what I'm drawing, but I am at a loss as to John> what that something is. John> Can you point me in the right direction? Without a complete code example, I can only guess. My guess is that you are using the wrong transforms. Each axis instance has a transAxis and a transData attribute you can use. When you want to specify a coordinate in axis units (0,1), use the transAxis instance. If you want to specify a coordinate in data units, use transData. Eg, if you want the vertical lines (x coords) of your table to line up with the xticks and the horizontal lines (y coords) of your table to be in axis units (eg 10% of the axis apart), you would initialize your line like ypos = 0.1 # 10% of axes height line = Line2D( self.dpi, self.bbox, xdata=(xpos, xpos), ydata=(0, ypos), color='k', linestyle=':', transx = self.axes.xaxis.transData, transy = self.axes.yaxis.transAxis, ) Make sure you turn clipping off (it appears you did for your examples), particularly while developing. John> (aside: it did occur to me that one way i could cheat an John> nearly get what i want is to use the bar() method to draw my John> grid + then use the text() method to enter all the text I John> want in the grid...) Cheating is usually a bad thing. I think you'll need to construct your own text instances with the same x and y transforms you use for your lines, eg, x coordinate in data units and y coordinate in axis units. This will also encapsulate the table as a single instance which will make it easier to manipulate; eg to set text properties for the entire table. Hope this helps, if not send me a complete example with demo script and I can take a closer look. JDH |
From: John G. <jn...@eu...> - 2004-02-03 11:44:34
|
John, Thanks for the hints. First I've tried subscribing to the devel list -- sourceforge is sulking again, so no joy so far, i've cc'ed the list on this, so if it accepts posts from non-subcribees it should get there. I've looked a bit at the transforms stuff + things are making a bit more sense, but I'm still unable to achieve what I'd like. I think the basic problem is that Line2D and Rectangle are intended to draw on the axes, whereas what I'd ideally like to do is draw outside the axes (see the screenshot i sent originally) -- ie instead of doing what is done with the legend and have it appear somewhere within the axes of the plot I'd like the table of data to be outside this. I was hoping I could do things like specify negative y-positions to draw below the axes, but I now think I'm deluded in thinking this 'cos matplotlib is smart and every time something gets drawn the axes are automagically adjusted to make sure the latest lines/rectangles are included. I suspect I need some new sort of object to draw outside the axes - can you confirm that is the case? Plan B. would be to just live with putting the tables within the plot, as per the legend, but this doesn't work too well in general 'cos the table tends to obscure some important part of the plot. Let me know if this is still hard to understand and I'll try and get what I have into a state which demonstrates the problem I am running into. John |
From: John H. <jdh...@ac...> - 2004-02-04 06:37:08
|
>>>>> "John" == John Gill <jn...@eu...> writes: John> I was hoping I could do things like specify negative John> y-positions to draw below the axes, but I now think I'm John> deluded in thinking this 'cos matplotlib is smart and every John> time something gets drawn the axes are automagically John> adjusted to make sure the latest lines/rectangles are John> included. If this is the case it appears to me that you are using the axes.add_line command, no? That is where matplotlib does the autoscale view limits thingie. There is nothing in the architecture that prevents you from drawing outside the axes view limits, except for clipping, which you can set. I think you should have a Table class which is contained by the axes. The Table should derive from an Artist and implement the required _draw method, which is called with a renderer instance. This method should forward the draw call to all the text, lines and patches contained by the table, just as legend does. class Table def _draw(self, renderer): for line in self._lines: line.draw(renderer) for t in self._texts: t.draw(renderer) This is how Legend does it. If you set it up this way, the axes instances won't know anything about the line instances and you can definitely draw outside the axes bbox. If not, matplotlib.axes has achieved consciousness and we are no longer in control <wink>. Note that it is critical that you make the call self.line1.set_clip_on(False) to allow drawing outside the axes bbox. Here's an example table class that you can use to draw inside or outside the axes bbox. Note there is no reason we can't do this at the figure level, but the advantage of doing it at the axes level is that you may want some of the lines to be in data coords, eg, the vertical lines lining up with the xticks in the example you showed me. It might be worth taking some time to figure out how to have figure tables or axes tables, eg with a base class and 2 derived classes, but for now focus on the axes table and we can generalize once you have the nuances worked out. class Table(Artist): def __init__(self, axes): Artist.__init__(self, axes.dpi, axes.bbox) self.axes = axes left = 0.9 right = 1.2 bottom = 0.9 top = 1.5 self.line1 = Line2D( axes.dpi, axes.bbox, (left, left), (bottom, top), transx=self.axes.xaxis.transAxis, transy=self.axes.yaxis.transAxis ) self.line1.set_clip_on(False) def _draw(self, renderer): self.line1.draw(renderer) You can add an add_table method to Axes, and define a list of class Axes(Artis): def __init__(self, blah, blah): # ..snip the other Axes init stuff self._tables = [] def add_table(self, table): self._tables.append(table) def _draw(self, renderer): # ..snip the other draw calls for table in self._tables: table.draw(renderer) I tested my code above with this scheme and it works - it drew a vertical blue line from inside the axes to outside. If you have any more troubles send me some code and I'll take a look. JDH |