Menu
▾
▴
matplotlib-devel
|
From: todd r. <tod...@gm...> - 2012-10-05 10:38:38
|
I am trying to do some experimental packages with python 3 and the latest RC, and I am trying to figure out the situation with some of the backends. Some are obvious, like wxwidgets and PyQt (Qt3 version). The issue I am running into is with the gtk backend PyGTK is deprecated. According to the website, all development halted a year and a half ago and they say to use PyGObject instead. PyGTK, as far as I can tell, does not support Python 3 or GTK 3. PyGObject, however, supports both. So I was wondering what I should be doing with this backend. Does matplotlib support PyGObject, or should the GTK backends just be disabled on Python 3 builds? Thanks for your help. -Todd |
|
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2012-10-05 13:57:20
|
On 10/05/2012 06:38 AM, todd rme wrote: > I am trying to do some experimental packages with python 3 and the > latest RC, and I am trying to figure out the situation with some of > the backends. Some are obvious, like wxwidgets and PyQt (Qt3 > version). > > The issue I am running into is with the gtk backend PyGTK is > deprecated. According to the website, all development halted a year > and a half ago and they say to use PyGObject instead. PyGTK, as far > as I can tell, does not support Python 3 or GTK 3. PyGObject, > however, supports both. So I was wondering what I should be doing > with this backend. Does matplotlib support PyGObject, or should the > GTK backends just be disabled on Python 3 builds? > The new Gtk3Cairo backend uses PyGObject and works under Python 3. (This refers to Gtk version 3, which is also only supported by PyGObject -- the backend could perhaps have been called PyGObject, but in fact the toolkit used is still Gtk, so the naming is perhaps a bit confusing). The older pygtk backend still ships with Python 3, but a warning is displayed when the user attempts to use it. Once PyGObject/PyCairo addresses a shortcoming [1] that prevents a bitmap buffer from being transferred to an on screen window, the Gtk3Agg backend will also work. http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2011-November/022519.html BTW -- this report has languished for almost a year. Does anyone know a better way to get the ear of the pycairo developers? Mike |
|
From: Benjamin R. <ben...@ou...> - 2012-10-05 14:36:47
|
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: > On 10/05/2012 06:38 AM, todd rme wrote: > > I am trying to do some experimental packages with python 3 and the > latest RC, and I am trying to figure out the situation with some of > the backends. Some are obvious, like wxwidgets and PyQt (Qt3 > version). > > The issue I am running into is with the gtk backend PyGTK is > deprecated. According to the website, all development halted a year > and a half ago and they say to use PyGObject instead. PyGTK, as far > as I can tell, does not support Python 3 or GTK 3. PyGObject, > however, supports both. So I was wondering what I should be doing > with this backend. Does matplotlib support PyGObject, or should the > GTK backends just be disabled on Python 3 builds? > > > The new Gtk3Cairo backend uses PyGObject and works under Python 3. (This > refers to Gtk version 3, which is also only supported by PyGObject -- the > backend could perhaps have been called PyGObject, but in fact the toolkit > used is still Gtk, so the naming is perhaps a bit confusing). The older > pygtk backend still ships with Python 3, but a warning is displayed when > the user attempts to use it. > > Once PyGObject/PyCairo addresses a shortcoming [1] that prevents a bitmap > buffer from being transferred to an on screen window, the Gtk3Agg backend > will also work. > > http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2011-November/022519.html > > BTW -- this report has languished for almost a year. Does anyone know a > better way to get the ear of the pycairo developers? > > Mike > > I had good response time when I went straight to their IRC channel one time (I don't remember the location, it was listed on their dev pages, I think). Ben Root |
|
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2012-10-05 16:05:18
|
On 10/05/2012 09:57 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > On 10/05/2012 06:38 AM, todd rme wrote: >> I am trying to do some experimental packages with python 3 and the >> latest RC, and I am trying to figure out the situation with some of >> the backends. Some are obvious, like wxwidgets and PyQt (Qt3 >> version). >> >> The issue I am running into is with the gtk backend PyGTK is >> deprecated. According to the website, all development halted a year >> and a half ago and they say to use PyGObject instead. PyGTK, as far >> as I can tell, does not support Python 3 or GTK 3. PyGObject, >> however, supports both. So I was wondering what I should be doing >> with this backend. Does matplotlib support PyGObject, or should the >> GTK backends just be disabled on Python 3 builds? >> > The new Gtk3Cairo backend uses PyGObject and works under Python 3. > (This refers to Gtk version 3, which is also only supported by > PyGObject -- the backend could perhaps have been called PyGObject, but > in fact the toolkit used is still Gtk, so the naming is perhaps a bit > confusing). The older pygtk backend still ships with Python 3, but a > warning is displayed when the user attempts to use it. > > Once PyGObject/PyCairo addresses a shortcoming [1] that prevents a > bitmap buffer from being transferred to an on screen window, the > Gtk3Agg backend will also work. > > http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2011-November/022519.html > It turns out that this was addressed in git last May and it does in fact work with matplotlib. Once a new pycairo release is out and makes it into the package managers, the Gtk3Agg backend should work on Python 3. Mike |
|
From: Damon M. <dam...@gm...> - 2012-10-05 15:40:32
|
On Friday, October 5, 2012, Michael Droettboom wrote: > On 10/05/2012 06:38 AM, todd rme wrote: > > I am trying to do some experimental packages with python 3 and the > latest RC, and I am trying to figure out the situation with some of > the backends. Some are obvious, like wxwidgets and PyQt (Qt3 > version). > > The issue I am running into is with the gtk backend PyGTK is > deprecated. According to the website, all development halted a year > and a half ago and they say to use PyGObject instead. PyGTK, as far > as I can tell, does not support Python 3 or GTK 3. PyGObject, > however, supports both. So I was wondering what I should be doing > with this backend. Does matplotlib support PyGObject, or should the > GTK backends just be disabled on Python 3 builds? > > > The new Gtk3Cairo backend uses PyGObject and works under Python 3. (This > refers to Gtk version 3, which is also only supported by PyGObject -- the > backend could perhaps have been called PyGObject, but in fact the toolkit > used is still Gtk, so the naming is perhaps a bit confusing). The older > pygtk backend still ships with Python 3, but a warning is displayed when > the user attempts to use it. > > Once PyGObject/PyCairo addresses a shortcoming [1] that prevents a bitmap > buffer from being transferred to an on screen window, the Gtk3Agg backend > will also work. > > http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2011-November/022519.html > > BTW -- this report has languished for almost a year. Does anyone know a > better way to get the ear of the pycairo developers? > > Mike > Do we use pycairo to interface with the Cairo library? Is there any reason we don't use the C (or C++, I can't remember what libcairo is written in) directly? This may get around the issue, but it'd be a lot of work... -- Damon McDougall http://www.damon-is-a-geek.com B2.39 Mathematics Institute University of Warwick Coventry West Midlands CV4 7AL United Kingdom |
|
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2012-10-05 16:53:43
|
On 10/05/2012 11:40 AM, Damon McDougall wrote: > On Friday, October 5, 2012, Michael Droettboom wrote: > > On 10/05/2012 06:38 AM, todd rme wrote: >> I am trying to do some experimental packages with python 3 and the >> latest RC, and I am trying to figure out the situation with some of >> the backends. Some are obvious, like wxwidgets and PyQt (Qt3 >> version). >> >> The issue I am running into is with the gtk backend PyGTK is >> deprecated. According to the website, all development halted a year >> and a half ago and they say to use PyGObject instead. PyGTK, as far >> as I can tell, does not support Python 3 or GTK 3. PyGObject, >> however, supports both. So I was wondering what I should be doing >> with this backend. Does matplotlib support PyGObject, or should the >> GTK backends just be disabled on Python 3 builds? >> > The new Gtk3Cairo backend uses PyGObject and works under Python > 3. (This refers to Gtk version 3, which is also only supported by > PyGObject -- the backend could perhaps have been called PyGObject, > but in fact the toolkit used is still Gtk, so the naming is > perhaps a bit confusing). The older pygtk backend still ships > with Python 3, but a warning is displayed when the user attempts > to use it. > > Once PyGObject/PyCairo addresses a shortcoming [1] that prevents a > bitmap buffer from being transferred to an on screen window, the > Gtk3Agg backend will also work. > > http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2011-November/022519.html > > BTW -- this report has languished for almost a year. Does anyone > know a better way to get the ear of the pycairo developers? > > Mike > > > Do we use pycairo to interface with the Cairo library? Is there any > reason we don't use the C (or C++, I can't remember what libcairo is > written in) directly? > > This may get around the issue, but it'd be a lot of work... > We do use pycairo. It certainly would get around the issue, but duplicate a lot of effort that pycairo already handles for us. Now that I've seen that the bug has been fixed in pycairo's git (see my earlier message), I'm comfortable just waiting for the next pycairo release (assuming it's not too far off). Mike |
|
From: Damon M. <dam...@gm...> - 2012-10-05 17:06:24
|
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: > On 10/05/2012 11:40 AM, Damon McDougall wrote: > > On Friday, October 5, 2012, Michael Droettboom wrote: >> >> On 10/05/2012 06:38 AM, todd rme wrote: >> >> I am trying to do some experimental packages with python 3 and the >> latest RC, and I am trying to figure out the situation with some of >> the backends. Some are obvious, like wxwidgets and PyQt (Qt3 >> version). >> >> The issue I am running into is with the gtk backend PyGTK is >> deprecated. According to the website, all development halted a year >> and a half ago and they say to use PyGObject instead. PyGTK, as far >> as I can tell, does not support Python 3 or GTK 3. PyGObject, >> however, supports both. So I was wondering what I should be doing >> with this backend. Does matplotlib support PyGObject, or should the >> GTK backends just be disabled on Python 3 builds? >> >> The new Gtk3Cairo backend uses PyGObject and works under Python 3. (This >> refers to Gtk version 3, which is also only supported by PyGObject -- the >> backend could perhaps have been called PyGObject, but in fact the toolkit >> used is still Gtk, so the naming is perhaps a bit confusing). The older >> pygtk backend still ships with Python 3, but a warning is displayed when the >> user attempts to use it. >> >> Once PyGObject/PyCairo addresses a shortcoming [1] that prevents a bitmap >> buffer from being transferred to an on screen window, the Gtk3Agg backend >> will also work. >> >> http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2011-November/022519.html >> >> BTW -- this report has languished for almost a year. Does anyone know a >> better way to get the ear of the pycairo developers? >> >> Mike > > > Do we use pycairo to interface with the Cairo library? Is there any reason > we don't use the C (or C++, I can't remember what libcairo is written in) > directly? > > This may get around the issue, but it'd be a lot of work... > > We do use pycairo. It certainly would get around the issue, but duplicate a > lot of effort that pycairo already handles for us. > > Now that I've seen that the bug has been fixed in pycairo's git (see my > earlier message), I'm comfortable just waiting for the next pycairo release > (assuming it's not too far off). > > Mike Of course. I was merely asking to qualm my curiosity rather than suggesting a major codebase re-haul. Thanks for looking into this. -- Damon McDougall http://www.damon-is-a-geek.com B2.39 Mathematics Institute University of Warwick Coventry West Midlands CV4 7AL United Kingdom |
|
From: Chris B. <chr...@no...> - 2012-10-05 18:53:48
|
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: > We do use pycairo. It certainly would get around the issue, but duplicate a > lot of effort that pycairo already handles for us. A bit OT -- but have you added, and or does pyCairo have, numpy-array awareness? i.e. is there an efficient way to pass a lo tof coordinate parie,s etc to pyCairo? Just wondering, 'cause I'm trying to decide on a rendering lib to use for another project. -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception Chr...@no... |
|
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2012-10-05 19:24:43
|
On 10/05/2012 02:53 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: > >> We do use pycairo. It certainly would get around the issue, but duplicate a >> lot of effort that pycairo already handles for us. > A bit OT -- but have you added, and or does pyCairo have, numpy-array awareness? > > i.e. is there an efficient way to pass a lo tof coordinate parie,s etc > to pyCairo? > > Just wondering, 'cause I'm trying to decide on a rendering lib to use > for another project. > Not as far as I know for path data. The upcoming pycairo version supports using image buffers (which can be Numpy arrays), but that's not helpful for drawing lines etc. Mike |
|
From: Chris B. <chr...@no...> - 2012-10-06 18:22:48
|
On Oct 5, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: > On 10/05/2012 02:53 PM, Chris Barker wrote: >> The upcoming pycairo version > supports using image buffers (which can be Numpy arrays), but that's not > helpful for drawing lines etc. > Thx-I did see some add-on code for using numpy arrays with pycairo once. Maybe I'll look for that, and/or work on add-on code myself. -Chris |
|
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2012-10-08 13:14:28
|
On 10/06/2012 02:22 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On Oct 5, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: > >> On 10/05/2012 02:53 PM, Chris Barker wrote: >>> The upcoming pycairo version >> supports using image buffers (which can be Numpy arrays), but that's not >> helpful for drawing lines etc. >> > Thx-I did see some add-on code for using numpy arrays with pycairo once. > > Maybe I'll look for that, and/or work on add-on code myself. > This would be much appreciated. We should leave the pure Python implementation in for those who don't have the cairo C headers installed or findable. Mike |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X