Menu
▾
▴
matplotlib-devel
|
From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2012-06-09 21:14:52
|
I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.1/ As soon as we get binaries, I'll send out another call for testing on the users list. Russell and Christoph, easiest if you just upload the binaries directly. You should both have permissions on the sf site. A copy of the site docs are available at http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/rc/v1.1.1rc2/ |
|
From: Eric F. <ef...@ha...> - 2012-06-09 22:11:33
|
On 06/09/2012 11:14 AM, John Hunter wrote: > I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site John, Is it intentional that the tarballs include doc/build? Eric > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.1/ > > As soon as we get binaries, I'll send out another call for testing on > the users list. Russell and Christoph, easiest if you just upload the > binaries directly. You should both have permissions on the sf site. > > A copy of the site docs are available at > http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/rc/v1.1.1rc2/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel |
|
From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2012-06-09 22:21:28
|
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> wrote: > On 06/09/2012 11:14 AM, John Hunter wrote: >> I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site > > John, > > Is it intentional that the tarballs include doc/build? It isn't intentional and it looks like it only affected the "notests" dist. Fixed it -- thanks for catching it. |
|
From: Eric F. <ef...@ha...> - 2012-06-09 22:27:17
|
On 06/09/2012 12:21 PM, John Hunter wrote: > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Eric Firing<ef...@ha...> wrote: >> On 06/09/2012 11:14 AM, John Hunter wrote: >>> I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site >> >> John, >> >> Is it intentional that the tarballs include doc/build? > > It isn't intentional and it looks like it only affected the "notests" > dist. Fixed it -- thanks for catching it. It also has backend_gdk.c (supposed to be a temporary copy of _backend_gdk.c) and some others like it. Which raises the question: why are these temporary copies needed at all? I don't see any explanation in setupext.py. I imagine it has to do with how some systems handle the leading underscore on the name, but it would be nice to have it explained in a comment in setupext.py. Eric |
|
From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2012-06-09 22:33:40
|
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> wrote: > It also has backend_gdk.c (supposed to be a temporary copy of > _backend_gdk.c) and some others like it. OK, I'll rebuild them super clean... I know what went wrong. |
|
From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2012-06-09 22:40:53
|
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:33 PM, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> wrote: >> It also has backend_gdk.c (supposed to be a temporary copy of >> _backend_gdk.c) and some others like it. > > OK, I'll rebuild them super clean... I know what went wrong. Just uploaded two new files built from clean git checkouts. |
|
From: Benjamin R. <ben...@ou...> - 2012-06-10 01:52:59
|
Don't forget to tag the rc in git! On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 6:40 PM, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:33 PM, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> wrote: > >> It also has backend_gdk.c (supposed to be a temporary copy of > >> _backend_gdk.c) and some others like it. > > > > OK, I'll rebuild them super clean... I know what went wrong. > > Just uploaded two new files built from clean git checkouts. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel > |
|
From: Christoph G. <cg...@uc...> - 2012-06-10 01:53:54
|
Hi John, the matplotlib-1.1.1rc2.win installers are at <http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#matplotlib>. I am again unable to upload them to SF. They are built against numpy 1.6.2 and include the test files. All tests pass on Python 2.7, 32 and 64 bit. Christoph On 6/9/2012 2:14 PM, John Hunter wrote: > I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.1/ > > As soon as we get binaries, I'll send out another call for testing on > the users list. Russell and Christoph, easiest if you just upload the > binaries directly. You should both have permissions on the sf site. > > A copy of the site docs are available at > http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/rc/v1.1.1rc2/ > > |
|
From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2012-06-10 02:13:15
|
Thanks -- I've already started the process for the files, but can you test upload something into the 1.1 folder (easy to subsequently delete). I just made you a project admin. I'd like to get this figure out eventually! On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Christoph Gohlke <cg...@uc...> wrote: > Hi John, > > the matplotlib-1.1.1rc2.win installers are at > <http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#matplotlib>. I am again unable > to upload them to SF. > > They are built against numpy 1.6.2 and include the test files. All tests > pass on Python 2.7, 32 and 64 bit. > > Christoph > > > > On 6/9/2012 2:14 PM, John Hunter wrote: >> >> I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site >> >> >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.1/ >> >> As soon as we get binaries, I'll send out another call for testing on >> the users list. Russell and Christoph, easiest if you just upload the >> binaries directly. You should both have permissions on the sf site. >> >> A copy of the site docs are available at >> http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/rc/v1.1.1rc2/ >> >> > |
|
From: Sandro T. <mo...@de...> - 2012-06-10 20:27:41
|
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:14 PM, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote: > I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.1/ Debian package built and uploaded - thanks! Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi |
|
From: RuiDC <ru...@ya...> - 2012-06-11 13:41:03
|
Testing looks good only two known fails for me against the rc2 binaries that I spotted on SF on both Windows7 amd64 and Windows XP x86_32 (both Python 2.7.3). The only thing out of the ordinary for me is the following on both: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_markevery_line.test ... ok C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\lines.py:461: RuntimeWarning: invalid value encountered in greater_equal return np.alltrue(x[1:]-x[0:-1]>=0) matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_nonfinite_limits.test ... ok I'd seen this on Sandro Tosi's output on this ML, is this a known numpy issue? (using the Christoph Gohlke 1.6.2 MKL binaries) Thanks, RuiDC -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/v1.1.1rc2-tarballs-are-up-tp33987325p33993195.html Sent from the matplotlib - devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
|
From: Sandro T. <mo...@de...> - 2012-06-11 15:41:24
|
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:40 PM, RuiDC <ru...@ya...> wrote: > > Testing looks good only two known fails for me against the rc2 binaries that > I spotted on SF on both Windows7 amd64 and Windows XP x86_32 (both Python > 2.7.3). > > The only thing out of the ordinary for me is the following on both: > > matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_markevery_line.test ... ok > C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\lines.py:461: RuntimeWarning: > invalid value encountered in greater_equal > return np.alltrue(x[1:]-x[0:-1]>=0) > matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_nonfinite_limits.test ... ok > > I'd seen this on Sandro Tosi's output on this ML, is this a known numpy > issue? (using the Christoph Gohlke 1.6.2 MKL binaries) yep: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2012-June/062734.html -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi |
|
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2012-06-11 15:32:54
|
John: Do you know which git revision you made the tarballs from? I'll go ahead and tag it. Mike On 06/09/2012 09:52 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > Don't forget to tag the rc in git! > > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 6:40 PM, John Hunter <jd...@gm... > <mailto:jd...@gm...>> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:33 PM, John Hunter <jd...@gm... > <mailto:jd...@gm...>> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Eric Firing <ef...@ha... > <mailto:ef...@ha...>> wrote: > >> It also has backend_gdk.c (supposed to be a temporary copy of > >> _backend_gdk.c) and some others like it. > > > > OK, I'll rebuild them super clean... I know what went wrong. > > Just uploaded two new files built from clean git checkouts. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. > Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in > malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > <mailto:Mat...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel |
|
From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2012-06-11 18:18:15
|
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: > John: Do you know which git revision you made the tarballs from? I'll go > ahead and tag it. https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/commit/97f713098a71c70d70c46602794c2a0fd126b614 |
|
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2012-06-11 18:24:03
|
On 06/11/2012 02:17 PM, John Hunter wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Michael Droettboom<md...@st...> wrote: >> John: Do you know which git revision you made the tarballs from? I'll go >> ahead and tag it. > https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/commit/97f713098a71c70d70c46602794c2a0fd126b614 Thanks. Done. Here's what it was, if curious: >git tag v1.1.1-rc2 97f713098a71c70d70c46602794c2a0fd126b614 >git push --tags upstream Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) To gi...@gi...:matplotlib/matplotlib.git * [new tag] v1.1.1-rc2 -> v1.1.1-rc2 Mike |
|
From: Benjamin R. <ben...@ou...> - 2012-06-13 17:30:27
|
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: > On 06/11/2012 02:17 PM, John Hunter wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Michael Droettboom<md...@st...> > wrote: > >> John: Do you know which git revision you made the tarballs from? I'll > go > >> ahead and tag it. > > > https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/commit/97f713098a71c70d70c46602794c2a0fd126b614 > Thanks. Done. > > Here's what it was, if curious: > > >git tag v1.1.1-rc2 97f713098a71c70d70c46602794c2a0fd126b614 > >git push --tags upstream > Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) > To gi...@gi...:matplotlib/matplotlib.git > * [new tag] v1.1.1-rc2 -> v1.1.1-rc2 > > Mike > > Is there a slight mix-up in the commits? In the email John sent out, it had commit f763cd11f50437568f8146b822ca8f25647cbb61 at the top of the log (alternative baseline image for mathfont_stix_14.png). Just checking. Ben Root |
|
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2012-06-13 18:04:21
|
On 06/13/2012 01:29 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st... > <mailto:md...@st...>> wrote: > > On 06/11/2012 02:17 PM, John Hunter wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Michael > Droettboom<md...@st... <mailto:md...@st...>> wrote: > >> John: Do you know which git revision you made the tarballs > from? I'll go > >> ahead and tag it. > > > https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/commit/97f713098a71c70d70c46602794c2a0fd126b614 > Thanks. Done. > > Here's what it was, if curious: > > >git tag v1.1.1-rc2 97f713098a71c70d70c46602794c2a0fd126b614 > >git push --tags upstream > Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) > To gi...@gi...:matplotlib/matplotlib.git > * [new tag] v1.1.1-rc2 -> v1.1.1-rc2 > > Mike > > > Is there a slight mix-up in the commits? In the email John sent out, > it had commit f763cd11f50437568f8146b822ca8f25647cbb61 at the top of > the log (alternative baseline image for mathfont_stix_14.png). > > Just checking. Which e-mail is this? I couldn't figure out what commit the tarball was based on which is why I asked John. If we can confirm the correct commit, I'm happy to move the tag. Mike |
|
From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2012-06-13 18:22:45
|
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: > Is there a slight mix-up in the commits? In the email John sent out, it had > commit f763cd11f50437568f8146b822ca8f25647cbb61 at the top of the log > (alternative baseline image for mathfont_stix_14.png). The tag is correct, the email log had an extra commit in it that is not in the rc. My bad. |
|
From: Neal B. <ndb...@gm...> - 2012-06-13 21:40:41
|
Since installing this on fedora f17 x86_64, I see this warning: ipython -pylab ... ** (process:26729): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype 'GMountMountFlags' as enum when in fact it is of type 'GFlags' ** (process:26729): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype 'GDriveStartFlags' as enum when in fact it is of type 'GFlags' ** (process:26729): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype 'GSocketMsgFlags' as enum when in fact it is of type 'GFlags' Welcome to pylab, a matplotlib-based Python environment [backend: GTKAgg]. For more information, type 'help(pylab)'. |
|
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2012-06-14 00:52:50
|
I don't think this has anything to do with matplotlib, but instead just with pygobject (or perhaps just gtk itself) on Fedora 17. I suspect that this fedora bug is responsible: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790053 Importing gtk is enough to produce this warning: In [1]: import gtk ** (process:15013): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype 'GMountMountFlags' as enum when in fact it is of type 'GFlags' ** (process:15013): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype 'GDriveStartFlags' as enum when in fact it is of type 'GFlags' ** (process:15013): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype 'GSocketMsgFlags' as enum when in fact it is of type 'GFlags' Mike On 06/13/2012 05:40 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > Since installing this on fedora f17 x86_64, I see this warning: > > ipython -pylab > ... > > ** (process:26729): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype 'GMountMountFlags' as > enum when in fact it is of type 'GFlags' > > ** (process:26729): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype 'GDriveStartFlags' as > enum when in fact it is of type 'GFlags' > > ** (process:26729): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype 'GSocketMsgFlags' as > enum when in fact it is of type 'GFlags' > > Welcome to pylab, a matplotlib-based Python environment [backend: GTKAgg]. > For more information, type 'help(pylab)'. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel |
|
From: Sandro T. <mo...@de...> - 2012-06-21 18:01:48
|
Hi all, On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:14 PM, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote: > I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site Is there a timeline for the final release? The Debian freeze is announced for June 30th. Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi |
|
From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2012-06-30 18:46:32
|
Well, looks like we better get moving then ;-). I have some time today to do this (sorry for dropping out last week). The only PR I see that perhaps should go in is https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/961 Anything I'm missing? I'm going to start testing this for the final release and will put something out later today Sandro. On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Sandro Tosi <mo...@de...> wrote: > Hi all, > > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:14 PM, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote: > > I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site > > Is there a timeline for the final release? The Debian freeze is > announced for June 30th. > > Cheers, > -- > Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) > My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ > Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi > |
|
From: Fernando P. <fpe...@gm...> - 2012-06-30 19:41:27
|
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:46 AM, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote: > Well, looks like we better get moving then ;-) Go MPL! It would be great to have matching releases of IPython and MPL, just in time for the Debian freeze and SciPy 2012 :) Cheers, f |
|
From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2012-06-30 19:56:21
|
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Fernando Perez <fpe...@gm...>wrote: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:46 AM, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote: > > Well, looks like we better get moving then ;-) > > Go MPL! It would be great to have matching releases of IPython and > MPL, just in time for the Debian freeze and SciPy 2012 :) > > OK, the v1.1.1 tarball is up at https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.1 and this is now the download folder the main site points to. I'm leaving up the rc2 binaries til Russell and Christoph can build v1.1.1 binaries and we get them uploaded. Sandro, if you're around, you are good to go for including this in debian, hopefully squeaking in under the freeze (sorry for the last minute push). I will hold off on the users and announce list emails til the updated binaries are up. Tagged: git tag v1.1.1 7e47149a7b05f8e5cf1cc899a7e4e7c90dd4244f Thanks to all! JDH |
|
From: Fernando P. <fpe...@gm...> - 2012-06-30 19:58:41
|
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 12:55 PM, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote: > OK, the v1.1.1 tarball is up > at https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.1 > and this is now the download folder the main site points to. I'm leaving up > the rc2 binaries til Russell and Christoph can build v1.1.1 binaries and we > get them uploaded. Sandro, if you're around, you are good to go for > including this in debian, hopefully squeaking in under the freeze (sorry for > the last minute push). > > I will hold off on the users and announce list emails til the updated > binaries are up. > > Tagged: git tag v1.1.1 7e47149a7b05f8e5cf1cc899a7e4e7c90dd4244f > > Thanks to all! Awesome, congrats! |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X