On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:32:04AM -0800, Andrew Straw wrote:
> If we're going to use setuptools (actually already required for Python
> 2.3), I think we need to do it completely and not optionally --
> otherwise users will start to depend on its features, which simply won't
> be there in some cases. In particular, I suspect they will make use of
> the dependency resolution mechanisms. As I suggested on the ipython-dev
> list this will do what you want without requiring a change to setup.py:
> python -c "import setuptools; execfile('setup.py')" develop
OK, I'll settle for this.
Gaël
|