Re: [Mason] ttys

[Ken W. <pro...@nw...>]

If reliably persistent storage isn't important I've had good  
performance with MySQL's MEMORY (fka HEAP) table type.  All the  
functionality of normal MySQL tables but never written to disk.

On Nov 27, 2007, at 6:32 AM, Perrin Harkins wrote:

> On Nov 26, 2007 10:43 PM, namotco <tec...@wo...> wrote:
>> What about using shared memory?  ShareLite for instance.  Are there
>> dis/advantages?
>
> Unfortunately, ShareLite has terrible performance.  You can nearly
> always beat it with standard files or MySQL.  You can beat it by miles
> with Cache::FastMmap or BerkeleyDB.
>
> - Perrin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Mason-users mailing list
> Mas...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
>