[Madwifi-devel] HAL 0.9.20.3 [Was: Re: Workqueue changes and 0.9.3]
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
otaku
From: Scott R. <sco...@gm...> - 2006-12-21 09:11:14
|
That was supposed to be a reply-to-all, sorry Mike. Reposted here: Begin forwarded message: > From: Scott Raynel <sco...@gm...> > Date: 21 December 2006 10:08:11 PM > To: Michael Renzmann <ma...@no...> > Subject: HAL 0.9.20.3 [Was: Re: [Madwifi-devel] Workqueue changes > and 0.9.3] > > > On 12/12/2006, at 11:20 PM, Michael Renzmann wrote: > >> Hi. >> >>> 0.9.3 still has open tickets that need either to be closed or >>> postponed. >>> I agree with your opinion, we should hold the 0.9.3 release back >>> until >>> the changes you've mentioned are handled properly. >> >> Just to mention it: Sam recently published a new HAL version for >> testing >> purposes. It's no release yet, as far as his announcement is >> concerned: >> >> See also: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.current/86650/ >> focus=86650 >> >> Should we care to commit the new HAL before 0.9.3 is out of the >> door? On >> the one hand it might introduce new problems, on the other hand >> our "usual >> release testing" might result in valuable feedback for Sam. >> >> Comments? > > The new HAL is not quite a drop-in replacement, as it changes the > way the descriptors work, which touches quite a few parts of the > driver. I don't think we should hold off 0.9.3 for it. > > However, there is quite a bit of demand, as can be seen from ticket > #1001 (MacBook Pro users). Also, after discussing the timestamp > issue with Sam, it would appear that the new HAL also provides a > way to check the resolution of the timestamps. I would like to get > this feature in, so I guess I'll put my hand up to do the necessary > work to integrate the new HAL. > > That said, I'm going to be away for the next couple of weeks, > starting tomorrow. Once I get back, I'd like to create a new branch > and make the necessary changes to madwifi there, letting people > test the new HAL without breaking trunk. > > What do you think? > >> >> Bye, Mike > > -- > Scott Raynel > WAND Network Research Group > Department of Computer Science > University of Waikato > New Zealand > > > -- Scott Raynel WAND Network Research Group Department of Computer Science University of Waikato New Zealand |