Re: [madman-discuss] Windows

[Andy H. <ahe...@gm...>]

On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 02:10:16 +0100, Andreas Kl=F6ckner <ma...@ti...> wr=
ote:
> Hi Andy,
>=20
> I don't know. While I wouldn't particularly mind anyone porting madman, I
> really have no practical interest in it myself. Someone asked a while bac=
k if
> anything was being done, but the thread sort of died after that.
>=20
> Last time I checked, the noncommercial Qt for pure Windows was still vers=
ion
> 2.something, which will probably not suffice to compile madman, and on to=
p of
> that, will likely only work with the MS toolchain, i.e. no Cygwin. On the
> other hand, Qt/X11+Cygwin+XFree+XMMS on Windows might actually be pretty
> feasible. If you come up with a patch, I'd certainly take it.
>=20
> Andreas
>=20
>=20
>=20

I don't know nearly enough to be able to do my own patch.  I was
mainly wondering if anyone had tried this already.

I didn't realize the newer versions of the Windows version aren't
GPLed.  That seems kind of weird.  (We're actually using Qt for
Windows where I work, but it's the Enterprise version)
Oh well.

   -Andy