[Lxr-general] RE: Lxr-general digest, Vol 1 #10 - 2 msgs

[MCALLISTER,RONAN (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <ron...@hp...>]

Hi LXR'ers

I played with 0.7 some months back prior to Malcom leading the initiative to
source-forge the code, and at that time I was trying to index plain-old
ANSI-C and Java 1.1 code, using postgres.  I spent quite a bit of time
playing with LXR and in the end had to give it up as it was so buggy and
poorly documented it was just not worth the time.

I'd love to play with it again, has the codebase improved much since then?

One complication is that I'm running the tools on HP-UX 10.20, so I had to
do quite a bit of software porting/compiling to get all the tools you are
used to on Linux work on HP-UX.  I don't think this was the root of the
problem, rather it seemed to be buggy postgres query code.

Is 0.9 stable enough, or does anyone have any experience with HP-UX and/or
postgres to know if it's worth a try now?

Should I give up with HP-UX and wait till I get Linux setup?

Thanks much for the help,
Ronan


-----Original Message-----
From: lxr...@li...
[mailto:lxr...@li...]
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 12:13
To: lxr...@li...
Subject: Lxr-general digest, Vol 1 #10 - 2 msgs


Send Lxr-general mailing list submissions to
	lxr...@li...

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxr-general
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	lxr...@li...

You can reach the person managing the list at
	lxr...@li...

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Lxr-general digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Newbie question (Peter Horst)
   2. Re: Newbie question (Malcolm Box)

--__--__--

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 16:17:34 -0600
From: Peter Horst <ph...@oi...>
To: Malcolm Box <ma...@br...>
Cc: lxr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Lxr-general] Newbie question

Thanks, I'll try again.  I should mention that I was confused by the lxr
webpage--it would be much clearer if the first link to Sourceforge
pointed to the lxr page, rather than the SF homepage, and if the link to
0.3 was removed, or commented somehow.

Thanks very much,

Peter

On Nov18, 00:44AM, Malcolm Box wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> Peter Horst wrote:
> > 
> > I've tried to set up lxr as per the directions. The problem is, whenever
> [snip]
> It looks like you are using v0.3 of the lxr.  If this is a new
> installation, I would seriously recommend using a more recent release,
> such as 0.9.
> [snip] 
> 
> Malcolm


--__--__--

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 12:23:11 +0900
From: Malcolm Box <ma...@br...>
To: Peter Horst <ph...@oi...>
Cc: lxr...@li...,
	Per Kristian Gjermshus <pk...@ne...>
Subject: Re: [Lxr-general] Newbie question

Hi Peter,

Peter Horst wrote:
> 
> Thanks, I'll try again.  I should mention that I was confused by the lxr
> webpage--it would be much clearer if the first link to Sourceforge
> pointed to the lxr page, rather than the SF homepage, and if the link to
> 0.3 was removed, or commented somehow.

You're right, this is confusing.  I hadn't noticed it before.

Per - is there any chance you could update the page so the first link
points to either http://sf.net/projects/lxr or http://lxr.sf.net ?

Cheers,

Malcolm



--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Lxr-general mailing list
Lxr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxr-general


End of Lxr-general Digest