[Lxr-dev] [ lxr-Bugs-998386 ] Freetext index rebuilt unnecessarily

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #998386, was opened at 2004-07-26 17:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ajlittoz
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=390117&aid=998386&group_id=27350

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: genxref
Group: current cvs
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Malcolm Box (mbox)
Assigned to: Dave Brondsema (brondsem)
Summary: Freetext index rebuilt unnecessarily

Initial Comment:
The new freetext indexing first algorithm doesn't check
if the file was already indexed before re-freetext
indexing it.  The result is that on an unchanged tree a
large amount of unnecessary indexing takes place.

The code should check whether the file has been
modified or not been indexed and if so, only then index it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Andre-Littoz (ajlittoz)
Date: 2012-04-03 09:10

Message:
IMHO it looks like Tagger.pm icludes such a feature => closing that bug
ajlittoz

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dave Brondsema (brondsem)
Date: 2004-07-27 13:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=341298

I'm not understanding.  Did it do this before?  I don't see
how.  Isn't that the freetext indexer's responsibility?  Or
did genxref do it somehow?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Malcolm Box (mbox)
Date: 2004-07-27 00:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=215386

This is using swish-e - haven't tested glimpse, but don't
see any logic that would prevent it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dave Brondsema (brondsem)
Date: 2004-07-26 17:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=341298

With glimpse or swish-e?  Or both?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=390117&aid=998386&group_id=27350