Thread: [Lxr-dev] [ lxr-Bugs-998386 ] Freetext index rebuilt unnecessarily
Brought to you by:
ajlittoz
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-07-27 00:35:22
|
Bugs item #998386, was opened at 2004-07-27 01:35 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=390117&aid=998386&group_id=27350 Category: genxref Group: current cvs Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Malcolm Box (mbox) Assigned to: Dave Brondsema (brondsem) Summary: Freetext index rebuilt unnecessarily Initial Comment: The new freetext indexing first algorithm doesn't check if the file was already indexed before re-freetext indexing it. The result is that on an unchanged tree a large amount of unnecessary indexing takes place. The code should check whether the file has been modified or not been indexed and if so, only then index it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=390117&aid=998386&group_id=27350 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-07-27 00:56:37
|
Bugs item #998386, was opened at 2004-07-26 20:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by brondsem You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=390117&aid=998386&group_id=27350 Category: genxref Group: current cvs Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Malcolm Box (mbox) Assigned to: Dave Brondsema (brondsem) Summary: Freetext index rebuilt unnecessarily Initial Comment: The new freetext indexing first algorithm doesn't check if the file was already indexed before re-freetext indexing it. The result is that on an unchanged tree a large amount of unnecessary indexing takes place. The code should check whether the file has been modified or not been indexed and if so, only then index it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Dave Brondsema (brondsem) Date: 2004-07-26 20:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=341298 With glimpse or swish-e? Or both? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=390117&aid=998386&group_id=27350 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-07-27 07:53:53
|
Bugs item #998386, was opened at 2004-07-27 01:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mbox You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=390117&aid=998386&group_id=27350 Category: genxref Group: current cvs Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Malcolm Box (mbox) Assigned to: Dave Brondsema (brondsem) Summary: Freetext index rebuilt unnecessarily Initial Comment: The new freetext indexing first algorithm doesn't check if the file was already indexed before re-freetext indexing it. The result is that on an unchanged tree a large amount of unnecessary indexing takes place. The code should check whether the file has been modified or not been indexed and if so, only then index it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Malcolm Box (mbox) Date: 2004-07-27 08:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=215386 This is using swish-e - haven't tested glimpse, but don't see any logic that would prevent it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dave Brondsema (brondsem) Date: 2004-07-27 01:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=341298 With glimpse or swish-e? Or both? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=390117&aid=998386&group_id=27350 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-07-27 20:45:31
|
Bugs item #998386, was opened at 2004-07-26 20:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by brondsem You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=390117&aid=998386&group_id=27350 Category: genxref Group: current cvs Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Malcolm Box (mbox) Assigned to: Dave Brondsema (brondsem) Summary: Freetext index rebuilt unnecessarily Initial Comment: The new freetext indexing first algorithm doesn't check if the file was already indexed before re-freetext indexing it. The result is that on an unchanged tree a large amount of unnecessary indexing takes place. The code should check whether the file has been modified or not been indexed and if so, only then index it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Dave Brondsema (brondsem) Date: 2004-07-27 16:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=341298 I'm not understanding. Did it do this before? I don't see how. Isn't that the freetext indexer's responsibility? Or did genxref do it somehow? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Malcolm Box (mbox) Date: 2004-07-27 03:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=215386 This is using swish-e - haven't tested glimpse, but don't see any logic that would prevent it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dave Brondsema (brondsem) Date: 2004-07-26 20:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=341298 With glimpse or swish-e? Or both? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=390117&aid=998386&group_id=27350 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-04-03 16:10:33
|
Bugs item #998386, was opened at 2004-07-26 17:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ajlittoz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=390117&aid=998386&group_id=27350 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: genxref Group: current cvs >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Malcolm Box (mbox) Assigned to: Dave Brondsema (brondsem) Summary: Freetext index rebuilt unnecessarily Initial Comment: The new freetext indexing first algorithm doesn't check if the file was already indexed before re-freetext indexing it. The result is that on an unchanged tree a large amount of unnecessary indexing takes place. The code should check whether the file has been modified or not been indexed and if so, only then index it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Andre-Littoz (ajlittoz) Date: 2012-04-03 09:10 Message: IMHO it looks like Tagger.pm icludes such a feature => closing that bug ajlittoz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dave Brondsema (brondsem) Date: 2004-07-27 13:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=341298 I'm not understanding. Did it do this before? I don't see how. Isn't that the freetext indexer's responsibility? Or did genxref do it somehow? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Malcolm Box (mbox) Date: 2004-07-27 00:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=215386 This is using swish-e - haven't tested glimpse, but don't see any logic that would prevent it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dave Brondsema (brondsem) Date: 2004-07-26 17:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=341298 With glimpse or swish-e? Or both? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=390117&aid=998386&group_id=27350 |