From: Andrej N. G. <an...@re...> - 2013-07-17 21:02:09
|
Hello! 2noob2banoob has written on Wednesday, 17 July, at 22:43: >I'm not very active and experienced myself either so my suggestion may >not be the best, but I think a good thing to do would be to look through >the bug tracker and look for something which looks easy enough for you >to fix. Though, as you already said the migration to Qt complicates >things because pretty much everything is rewritten, so for most LXDE >components your bugfix may not end up in any version of LXDE which will >actually be used by anyone. I think that if you want your bugfixes to >actually make a difference it's best to work on a component which is >independent of GTK/Qt. For as far as I know LibFM and Menu-Cache are >possibilities. I believe I've heard sounds about making some menu-cache >replacement (not sure about that though) so if you really want your >contributions to make a difference it's probably best to contribute to >LibFM. I don't know about the coding difficulty of LibFM though. Both menu-cache and LibFM are under my umbrella. Currently all found bugs in menu-cache (from all sources - tracker, IRC, this list, my own testing) are fixed and version 0.5.0 is released. The version 1.2.0 of the LibFM is in development and all bugs and most of feature requests will be fixed when 1.2.0-beta is released. And since constant development means a lot of changes in LibFM GIT it may be hard to fix anything in it for now, especially since most of things are fixed already in GIT. :) >Best regards, >2noob2banoob Cheers! Andriy. |