Re: [Lurker-users] Database question

[Kevin B. <co...@co...>]

"Wesley W. Terpstra" wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 07:47:13PM -0400, Kevin Brosius wrote:
> > I just added a large mbox to lurker (for my local LUG) and even though I
> > ran the purge script after shutting down lurkerd, I still see:
> >
> > Apr 15 19:41:18 sea lurkerd[10026]: CORRUPT dataset: Imported a message
> > from a new mbox which has timestamp earlier than present. This means an
> > mbox was added to the config file after the existing database had passed
> > this timestamp. All timestamps in this mbox will be wrecked.
> 
> Hmmm. That is odd.
> So, you did:
>         stop lurker
>         purge the database -- should only have three scripts left
>         edit config file to add new list
>         start lurker
> 
> ... and that didn't work?

Well, I'm not sure whether it worked or not...  lurkerd continued to run
after that.  Does it ignore messages after that error?  It appears not
to be indexing as many messages as I think it should.

This may be my fault.  I won't promise the base mbox files I'm using are
perfect.  I've used local Netscape mail files to start the archives for
past history, then added another mbox for current deliveries.

> 
> > It seems to have indexed messages, but the first page only shows 3?
> >
> > http://sea.kevb.net:3000/lurker/mindex/17...@pl...ml
> 
> I presume the problem has something to do with the first messages in plug.
> They all appear to have a really early timestamp.
> 
> Could you maybe try running 0.1f?
> Maybe even one of the pre-built versions?
> 
> It would be good to know if this was a bug introduced into cvs because I
> have never seen this one before.

Yes, I can certainly build 0.1f.  What pre-built versions are there?  I
don't see any on sourceforge?

-- 
Kevin