Re: [luabind] gcc 3.2 trouble

[Daniel W. <dal...@st...>]

At 19:07 2003-04-19, you wrote:
>I'm getting the following slightly confusing error message. It looks like 
>luabind doesn't like that my copy constructor is protected. I don't really 
>want any copies of the class to be allowed - am I asking too much? 
>Strangely enough, the same code compiles in VC7, but not on gcc 3.2.3
>
><snip huge error>
>
>Enno.

This is a bug in beta4, it has been fixed in the cvs. It was a stupid 
mistake by me in the implementation of is_bases, abstract base-classes doesn't
work either. You can get a working version from the cvs, which is stable 
for the weekend. After the weekend we'll release a new packade with
fixes for the most serious bugs.


Daniel Wallin, dal...@st...