From: anglofifi <ang...@fr...> - 2002-08-26 18:27:51
|
Hi guys. I'm setting up LTSP for the first time, so most of this stuff is new to = me. Here is my problem. The workstation boots up and connects to the = server. It continues happily, until it gets to the following point: : Mounting root filesystem: /opt/ltsp/i386 from 192.168.254 Doing the Pivot_root nfs: server 192.168.0.254 not responding, still trying From here nothing happens. Upon typing the following command on the = server, the following output is displayed: [root@localhost root]# tail -f /var/log/messages Aug 19 20:42:46 localhost dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.0.2 to = 00:50:22:82:52:b2 via eth0 Aug 19 20:42:48 localhost arpwatch: new station 192.168.0.2 = 0:50:22:82:52:b2 Aug 19 20:42:57 localhost rpc.mountd: authenticated mount request from = 192.168.0.2:689 for /opt/ltsp/i386 (/opt/ltsp/i386) Aug 19 20:43:28 localhost last message repeated 3 times Aug 19 20:44:35 localhost last message repeated 7 times Aug 19 20:45:45 localhost last message repeated 7 times Aug 19 20:46:55 localhost last message repeated 7 times Here are a few other outputs from the server: [root@localhost root]# iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination [root@localhost root]# ipchains -L ipchains: Incompatible with this kernel [root@localhost root]# rpcinfo -p program vers proto port 100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper 100024 1 udp 1024 status 100024 1 tcp 1024 status 391002 2 tcp 1025 sgi_fam 100011 1 udp 609 rquotad 100011 2 udp 609 rquotad 100011 1 tcp 612 rquotad 100011 2 tcp 612 rquotad 100005 1 udp 1027 mountd 100005 1 tcp 1026 mountd 100005 2 udp 1027 mountd 100005 2 tcp 1026 mountd 100005 3 udp 1027 mountd 100005 3 tcp 1026 mountd 100003 2 udp 2049 nfs 100003 3 udp 2049 nfs 100021 1 udp 1028 nlockmgr 100021 3 udp 1028 nlockmgr 100021 4 udp 1028 nlockmgr [root@localhost root]# I have tried everything I can think of to correct the problem. If anyone = has any ideas, it would be much appreciated. Thanx. Andrew Fife |