Re: [LTP] ltp enhancements

[Paul L. <pl...@au...>]

On Sat, 2002-05-18 at 13:49, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 08:43:20PM +0200, Ihno Krumreich wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > to extend what Andi and Dan said...
> > 
> > put LTP into an RPM to have a real binary distribution.
> 
> In case any LTP test fails you need to look at the source anyways 
> (so LTP without source installed is not very useful) 
Ihno, why would you want a binary rpm for LTP?  Is this something that
would actually be useful to anyone and why?  I've seen the suggestion
come up once in the past but it was shot down for the same reason Andi
just stated, and because there was never a good reason given to do it. 
I'm just curious if anyone out there has some good reason why they'd
like to see this done and why.

Thanks,
Paul Larson