From: Monson S. <js...@re...> - 2012-12-26 08:49:14
|
The test should result TFAIL if child is signalled from unexpected pid, instead of TBROK. The same as TPASS/TINFO . Signed-off-by: Monson Shao <js...@re...> --- testcases/kernel/containers/pidns/pidns16.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/testcases/kernel/containers/pidns/pidns16.c b/testcases/kernel/containers/pidns/pidns16.c index 04a1641..debc8d2 100644 --- a/testcases/kernel/containers/pidns/pidns16.c +++ b/testcases/kernel/containers/pidns/pidns16.c @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ #define PARENT_PID 0 char *TCID = "pidns16"; -int TST_TOTAL = 1; +int TST_TOTAL = 3; pid_t globalpid; /* @@ -87,10 +87,10 @@ void child_signal_handler(int sig, siginfo_t * si, void *unused) } if (si->si_pid == expected_pid) - tst_resm(TINFO, "child is signalled from expected pid %d", + tst_resm(TPASS, "child is signalled from expected pid %d", expected_pid); else - tst_resm(TBROK, "child is signalled from unexpected pid %d," + tst_resm(TFAIL, "child is signalled from unexpected pid %d," " expecting pid %d", si->si_pid, expected_pid); c++; -- 1.7.11.7 |